Nursing and scarce resources Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1000 words

Nursing and scarce visions - Essay ExampleIndeed, there make water been numerous studies on the apportionment of scarce resources in nursing. However, Health care administrators face numerous challenges in making wise to(p) decisions that relate to allocation of scarce resources in nursing. Ideally, the issue in this context involves the complexity and challenges of making honorable resource allocation decisions about health care. Describing Five Influencing Factors Notably, there are six portions which influence allocation decisions in the distribution of scarce resources in the health care system. These factors include lead, contribution, equity, patient effort, ability to pay, and sexual morality. Indeed, fleck most patients suffer from situations that warrant a known medical motivating for treatment or service, distinct persons may perceive need differently from the health care providers. As such, the professional justification of need defines the amount of resources conveyd for a certain treatment (Maddox 1). However, this justification may vary with that of a patient. Hence, need influences the allocation decisions that impact the patient although it is not a good basis for such decisions. Additionally, contribution in any case influences allocation decision making for scarce resources as the health providers seek to establish the significance of an unmarried to the society in the future. Indeed, young children, professionals, and skilled personnel may attract considerable allocation of resources compared to the older, unskilled, and severely educated individuals (Maddox 1). However, this criterion is un fairish and thus not the best for allocating scarce resources in nursing. Another factor that influences decisions in allocating scarce resources is equity which seeks to achieve equitable allocation of resources in health care. As such, as administrators seek to achieve equity, they influence their allocation decisions. However, although t his criterion is relevant, it is not effective in that individuals have a wide range of demand for health care services and thus do not require equal allocation of health care resources (Maddox 1). Moreover, the ability to pay in addition influences allocation of resources where individuals choose their health plan (Maddox 1). Hence we will consider the individuals ability to pay for the chosen health plan. However, this criterion limits the benefits increase from decisions made on allocation of resources especially on those who cannot afford to pay for health care. Ultimately, merit also influences decision making on the allocation of resources to the health care where allocation is based on merit (Maddox 1). The criterion is estimablely correct and derives numerous benefits as the administrators seek to be ethically right and fair in the decision making process. However, this criterion requires data to define the merits and conflicting data may unload the positive influence of merit in making allocation decisions. Citing the Data That Supports the Importance of the Issue We have a sample of 109 managers, 269 clinicians working in one of four VA medical centers which sought to characterize the staff members perceptions on regarding the fairness of healthcare ethics practices. Generally, the clinicians were more critical on allocation processes and the impact of resource decisions on patient care. Moreover, clinicians and managers stated that they insufficient information on ethics used in addressing ethical problems that